Curtam os melhores e maiores debates connosco, por favor:
Eis praticamente o nosso debate público e independente, no entanto, levamos em consideração várias abordagens em suas perspectivas...
Bem Haja Debates!
Hello Panelists and Co-religionists!
Before we start writing this article, we cordially greet all of you who carry out this art of circular dialectics to the letter. However, today you will learn what your attitude should be towards a Debate, since being a Panelist is a great privilege in this interactive web of global knowledge through an infinite worldview.
Beforehand, let's say who a Panelist really is. Well, let's say:
Panelist, Panel Member or Debater, the person who participates in a Debate, still pluralized would be:
Panelists, Panel Members or Debaters.
Understanding: A Panelist is an Opinion Former or a person who participates in a Debate.
By now you've understood, who's who, right?
Let's assume then, that the answer is "Yes", now we will move on to the heart of the question that we brought here.
👉 WHAT SHOULD PANELIST ATTITUDES BE IN A DEBATE?
📚🌍🇦🇴🏃✊🔥👏💡👀
Firstly, we will determine some points to be taken into consideration by any Panelist before a Debate, regarding their position on this subject in approach👇:
1st-Each Panelist must prepare in advance about the topic, at least 15 minutes.
2nd- Knowing the Moderator in advance gives you an advantage in your presentation, as you will already know the moderation direction of that professional.
3rd-Know the composition of the Debate: Will there be a presenter, moderator or moderators, who is holding the Debate, what are the other Panelists like, etc.?
4th-Find out what type of Debate will take place:
Academic, social, public, religious, scientific, philosophical, technical, family, private, community and other debates?
5th-Study a lot on the theme/subject that will be discussed.
6th-Prepare for the occasion, what type of clothing is recommended for such a Debate, for example:
It is not ethical to wear flip-flops to an academic debate that will take place in an amphitheater, with a large invited audience.
7th-If possible, bring the sources on which your research was based (books, websites, magazines, notes and others), so that you can give credibility to your arguments, when you suffer a contradiction.
8th-Know broadly the Debate environment, know where it will take place, at what time, how it will be conducted, what model of the Debate, rules of the organizers of such activity.
9th-Meet up with the Moderators and Other Panelists, before and after the Debate on display, so that you feel welcomed and not in a strange environment (as if you lived your entire life on Earth and would be stepping through first time on Mars😁).
10th-Be punctual before starting any Debate, this will undoubtedly give you greater peace of mind, otherwise, it would be arriving late or in a hurry, until you concentrate, you would already miss a lot of things going on in the Debate.
However, regarding the behaviors to be adopted during a Debate, there are countless, but we will limit ourselves to mentioning those that we consider to be priorities, not in an outlined way, but in an explanatory way.
Use the expression "data venia" or an equivalent, before refuting an opponent, as the first expression is Latin, and means "with your permission". Since in a Debate, there must always be cordiality and harmony, one must not lack respect for others.
Strictly avoid side conversations or discussions; It is very tempting to take sides during an argument, perhaps because the Moderator is not paying attention to us, but it is a gross error for any responsible Panelist to be speaking or listening outside the Debate, such an attitude constitutes a lack of interest in a Topic, disrespect for the Moderation and the Debate organizing team .
It's not good to be distracted during the discussion, it's as if you don't know where you are or what you are doing in that place.
Your arguments should always attack someone else's arguments and not someone else's. It's very simple, you shouldn't say that I don't agree/disagree with so-and-so, so-and-so or so-and-so, but that I disagree with the arguments of such and such.
Be careful with certain gestures you may make in a Debate, always avoid excesses, offensive gestures and even when smiling, you have to know the objectivity of it (is it to destabilize the opponent, cause irony or is it something so comical, inevitable not to laugh or smile?), regardless of such a justifiable reason, always opt for consideration.
Humility in a Debate, does not mean admitting that you were wrong during the discussion (admitting this means weakness and in such a way, you will lose the Debate), Humility means recognizing during the Debate, the valence, potential and qualities of an opponent (for this, we recommend that you read the work👉 *38 Strategies for winning any debate - Arthur Schopenhauer), when you do a Debate, you go to win and not be defeated.
When other Panelists are speaking, pay close attention to their presentations and opinions, analyze them to be able to refute, corroborate or antagonize, because if you interrupt them you will show that you are an unbalanced Panelist and did not prepare the discussion or not you did your homework (which is to prepare yourself, that's why you talk about other people's poor innocent soul😆), those who prepared paid attention and will eventually know when to enter the discussion or the point in question.
After the Debate, greet other Panelists kindly, apologize if you have acted excessively, as this demonstrates "fair play" - fair play, despite the shocks of the Debate, harmony and friendship between Panelists, is what's most valuable and not even the greatest treasure in the world, you can buy this❤️.
Anyway, we could write more exhaustively about this vast subject, but we think we have written enough to understand the essential "BEHAVIORS THAT ANY PANELIST SHOULD HAVE IN A DEBATE".
Now you just need to put this into practice, and in this way you will become a harmonious person, in the face of any Debate...
Nota Bene: Respect in a Debate is the most valuable thing✊!
PUBLICITY👇:
GrupoDebateLivre@gmail.com
A PERFORMANCE DE PAINELISTA
Como ter uma boa exibição como Painelista num Debate📚?
Olá Painelistas e Correligionários/as!
Antes de começarmos a escrever este artigo, saudemos cordialmente todos/as vocês que fazem esta arte da dialética circular ao pé da letra. No entanto, hoje vais aprender como deve ser a tua atitude diante dum Debate, uma vez que ser Painelista, é um grandioso privilégio nessa teia interativa do conhecimento global através duma infinita cosmovisão.
De antemão vamos dizer quem é realmente uma pessoa Painelista.,ora bem, diz-se:
Painelista, Membro de Painel ou Debatedora, a pessoa pessoa que participam num Debate, ainda pluralizar ficariam:
Painelistas, Membros de Painel ou Debatedoras.
Compreensão: Um/a Painelista, é um/a Formador/a de Opinião ou uma pessoa que participa num Debate.
Até aqui já entendeste, quem é quem, não é?
Vamos supor então, que a resposta seja um "Sim" agora partiremos para o cerne da questão que nós trouxe cá.
👉COMO DEVEM SER AS ATITUDES DE PAINELISTA NUM DEBATE?
📚🌍🇦🇴🏃✊🔥👏💡👀
Primeiramente, determinaremos alguns pontinhos a serem levados em consideração por qualquer Painelista ante um Debate, quanto sua posição nesse assunto em abordagem👇:
1-Cada Painelista, deve se preparar com uma antecedência acerca do tema, no mínimo de 15 minutos.
2-Conhecer previamente o/a Moderador/a, dá uma vantagem de sua exibição, pois de tal forma já conhecerá a direção da moderação de tal profissional.
3-Saber da composição do Debate: Terá apresentador/a,moderador/a ou moderadores/as, quem está a realizar o Debate,como são outros/outras Painelistas,etc.?
4-Saiba que tipo de Debate realizar-se-á:
Debate académico,social, público, religioso, científico, filosófico, técnico, familiar, privado, comunitário e outros?
5-Estudar muito a temática/assunto, que se vai discutir.
6-Preparar-se mediante a ocasião, que tipo de vestimenta recomenda-se em tal Debate,por exemplo:
Não é ético que se vá de chinelos, num Debate académico que realizar-se-á num Anfiteatro, pera uma grande Plateia convidada.
7-Caso for possível, traga as fontes onde foram baseadas as suas pesquisas(livros,sites,revistas, anotações e outros), afim de puderes dar credibilidade às tuas argumentações, quando sofrer uma contradição.
8-Conhecer amplamente o ambiente do Debate, saber onde se vai realizar, a quê hora, como se vai conduzir, qual modelo do Debate, regras dos/as organizadores/as de tal atividade.
9-Confraternizar-se com os/as Moderadores/as e Outros/as Painelistas, antes e depois do Debate em exposição, para que te sintas acolhido/a e não num ambiente estranho (como se vives toda uma vida na Terra e estarias pisando pela primeira vez em Marte😁).
10-Sê pontual antes de começar qualquer Debate, isso sem dúvida dar-te-á maior tranquilidade, caso diferente, seria chegar em atraso ou às pressas, até te concentrar, já perderías muita coisa a rolar no Debate.
No entanto, quanto aos comportamentos a adoptar no decorrer dum Debate, são inúmeros, porém limitar-nos-emos a mencionar aqueles que achamos ser prioritários, não numa forma delineada, mas sim explicativa.
Use a expressão "data venia" ou uma equivalente,antes de refutar um/a oponente, pois a primeira expressão é latina, e significa "com sua licença". Uma vez que num Debate, deva sempre haver cordialidade e harmonia, não se deve faltar ao respeito à outrem.
Evite rigorosamente, as conversas ou discussões laterais; é muito tentador criar alas durante uma discussão, talvez porque
o/a Moderador/a não nos esteja prestando atenção, mas é um erro crasso para qualquer Painelista responsável, estar a falar ou ouvir fora do Debate, tal atitude, constituí falta de interesse num Tema, desrespeito à Moderação e à equipe organizadora do Debate.
Não é nada bom se distrair durante a discussão, é como se não soubesses aonde estarias ou o que estivesses fazendo naquele lugar.
Os teus argumentos, devem sempre atacar os argumentos d'outrem e não à outrem. É muito simples, tu não deves dizer que não concordo/discordo com o/a fulano/a, beltrano/a ou sicrano/a, porém que discordo com os argumentos de tal ou de tais.
Cuidado com certos gestos que possas fazer num Debate, evite sempre os excessos, gesto ofensivo e mesmo ao sorrir, tens de saber a objetividade de tal (é para desestabilizar o/a oponente,causar ironia ou é algo tão cómico, inevitável de não rir ou sorrir?), independentemente de tal razão justificável, opte sempre pela ponderação.
Humildade num Debate, não significa admitir que estavas errado/a numa exposição durante a discussão (admitir isso, significa fraqueza e de tal maneira, perderás o Debate), Humildade significa reconhecer durante o Debate, a valência, potencialidades e qualidades dum/a oponente (para isso, recomendamos que leias a obra👉 *38 Estratégias para se vencer qualquer debate-Arthur Schopenhauer), quando faz à um Debate, vais para vencer e não seres derrotado/a.
Quando outros/as Painelistas estiverem falando, preste bastante atenção em suas exposições e opiniões, analises para conseguires refutar, corroborar ou antagonizar, pois se porventura, os/as interromper mostrarás que és um/a Painelista desequilibrado/a e não preparaste a discussão ou não fizeste a sua lição de casa (que é te preparar, por isso falas no alheio-pobre inocente alma😆), quem se preparou houve com atenção e saberá eventualmente, o momento de entrar na discussão ou no ponto em questão.
Após o Debate, saude amavelmente outros/as Painelistas, peça desculpas se porventura tenhas agido com alguns excessos, pois isso demonstra um "fair play" - jogo franco, não obstante, aos choques do Debate, a harmonia e a amizade entre Painelistas, é o que mais vale e nem o maior tesouro do Mundo, pode comprar isto❤️.
Enfim, exaustivamente poderíamos escrever mais acerca deste vastíssimo assunto, porém pensamos termos inscrito o suficiente para compreender sobre os essenciais "COMPORTAMENTOS QUE QUALQUER PAINELISTA, DEVE TER NUM DEBATE",
agora só faltará Você pôr isso em prática, e desta maneira tornar-te-ás numa pessoa harmoniosa, perante à qualquer Debate...
Nota Bene: O respeito num Debate é tudo que há de mais valioso✊!
#BemHajaDebates
Publicidade👇:
👉 GrupoDebateLivre@gmail.com
👉WhatsApp 📞+244954502811
👉@GrupoDebateLivre
Know these Opinion Shapers...
Who are the Opinion Shapers in a Debate?!
This rhetorical question is intriguing, isn't it? Obviously, it is💡🌍📚.
You've probably heard this name, Opinion Former, or not, so it doesn't really matter, let's go to the "Adam's Apple, in fact the Apple of the Question".
In a debate, an expert or several ad hoc experts would obviously be invited to come and clarify a certain topic under analysis, let's see, if it is about (Mental Health in Angola/or no) it would be or would seem convenient to call yourself a psychologist, psychiatrist or at least a nurse or doctor in Medicine, to more technically address this topic in its varied subjects, but that is beside the point, as this is much more preferable in a lecture, colloquium, forum or conference and not exactly in a debate, now this would require the specialist to have in-depth knowledge or mastery of dialectics, oratory and argumentative rhetoric, opening up gaps for controversies, refutations, counter-arguments and the like, as required for there to be a productive debate.
Meanwhile, it is therefore important to call on Opinion Shapers and not necessarily Experts, running the imminent risk of it not being a debate, but something like that (lecture or conference) with the aim of clarifying and not to discuss.
A hot question then inevitably arises:
*Who is the Opinion Former?*
Logically, when you come across any topic or subject, on television, radio, newspapers, books, in your family, at school, in society, at work, with friends or in your day-to-day life, You always have the tendency to form some opinion, either by thought or by externalizing it with an opinion, whether yours, someone else's or even personal.
*Some practical examples:*
Watch a soap opera unfold on TV and watch an episode or the entire drama and, unexpectedly, a thought arises or occurs to you, saying that the actor/actress should not adopt that type of behavior to the detriment of your perspective or something inherent to that.
Or even if you are watching a game on TV or in a stadium and you have a lot or little idea about the type of game, you will express or have your own opinion, despite or regarding the player, the nature of the team initial and other five hundred...
Now analyze all this understanding in a more organized structure, let’s go:
An *Opinion Former* is a researcher and/or investigator, who seeks knowledge, in order to be able to form a certain opinion to the detriment of all existing themes and subjects. The opinions expressed by an Opinion Former must be solid and consistent with the aim of awakening or bringing to light the truth and justice of things, unlike the Specialist who focuses solely and exclusively on understanding something of their specialty and not daring to enter into a generality, with the risk of not having solid views to the detriment of the subject under discussion.
Just by our human nature, this in itself, already gives us the ability to have our own and diverse opinions on all types of subjects or themes, however, we are already _Opinion Providers_ just by our own nature, once we have your own opinion about everything that exists in the world.
Regarding aspects linked to the debate, it is more than obvious that the Opinion Shapers constitute the entire structure of the panel (that is, they are the *Moderators, Panelists or Debaters,* and sometimes, the attending public/audience), however, it is understood that they researched the topic under discussion well in advance, having the legitimacy to express themselves with credible, authentic sources and clear references required in the categorization of a "Productive Debate", and as students, academics and enthusiasts of free knowledge, we must form opinions that provoke the truth and/or evident facts.
An *Opinion Former* should not be oblivious to current affairs, scientificity, philosophy, religious or social knowledge and the entire creative sphere of the World that surrounds us and beyond. In a debate, Opinion Shapers are people capable of addressing all the thematic aspects of what is being discussed, because it is understood that, even though they are not experts, they awaken the truth and justice of the subject, in order to agree a Public until then, still dormant and not enlightened to the detriment of a more preponderant look in the search for incorruptible knowledge, for the evolution of humanity, from the point of view of intellectual and cognitive maturity.
There is no age at which we can be Opinion Formers, these can be children, teenagers/young people and adults, as what really matters is the critical and argumentative capacity inherent to our creative-mental sense, obviously, it would be a A huge mistake is to think that an adult is more intelligent than a child/adolescent, just because of age and not intellectuality itself👎.
The Opinion Former in a debate, research, investigates, studies, follows the trail of facts and knowledge/events, guides himself through readings, is a friend of knowledge and cognitive freedom, is a being social and an intellectual, even before expressing their opinions regarding the topics under discussion. In all truth, the behavior of the opinion former with regard to the debate will depend on dialectical maturity and knowledge of techniques in participating in a debate by this Opinion Former.
Finally, I am not afraid or reluctantly intimidated from expressing your opinions, in your home, school, church, work, family and society, because to be a Trainer requires in-depth knowledge about the things in discussions.
We hope that we have been exhaustive enough, so that we have clarified everything or enough in learning the topic in question, continue in the company of our debate community and always learn with us about the deepest mysteries of this great Dialectical Art.
Well, let's have debates!
Our Contacts:
GrupoDebateLivre@gmail.com
WhatsApp to discuss📞+244954502811
Follow us on some social networks👉@GrupoDebateLivre
The role of the Moderator in a debate
It is very simple to understand the primary role of a moderator in a given debate, let's see:
What would a football or basketball game be without a referee?!
Evidently, the game would happen, however, we know what would happen, a game without rules "causes confusion", so this analogy is also similar to this purpose:
Debate without moderator "causes confusion"😁👎💔.
Understanding this is as simple as drinking water from a glass, it only goes wrong if you get distracted.
Let's get to this, this personality has the role of controlling the time of the debate, the time each panelist has to speak, redirecting the debate depending on the topic that is taking place, so that the real thematic intention does not go astray and is alienated. that is intended to be addressed; It is the professional's sole responsibility to inform all participants in the "Debate Panel" how the topic and/or subject in question should be discussed, establishing rules and modalities in the application of the quality of each participant in the discussion.
Observation:
The Moderator's position is comfortable, this means that, during the debate, at no time should he take sides with A or B, in their presentations, as their discursive collaboration is neutral (meaning that neither/ the Moderator must take steps to say that he/she agrees or disagrees on this or that point, but has the legitimacy to say that he/she understands or does not understand a certain point in question),It is understood in such a way that if you take a side, you must have left your position of "Debate Moderation" vulnerable to any attack by the Panelists, thus losing your authority in a debate or discussion.
-Furthermore, the Moderator must be impartial, in the way he/she addresses the various issues, must not imply even by a hair's breadth that he/she would be favoring any of the opponents, appealing or re-asking the questions with the aim of indirectly supporting one of the parties, because such a procedure would lower the entire quality of the debate to be discussed.
Since the Moderator is in a comfortable position, he/she should be the last person on the panel who, impossibly, should lose his/her temper because it is understood that at no time should he/she show nervousness or lack of concentration in the way he/she should address the questions to the Panel.
The debate does not belong to the Panelists, but to the Moderator, however we understand that if such a debate goes wrong, it is this character's fault and if it goes well, the applause is given to her., In order to maintain and create a quality debate, the Moderator must research in advance and study his/her Panel in advance, so that he/she knows some behaviors that will enhance his/her debate, opposing the harmful attitude of any Panelist, so that it does not spoil your debate.
The *Moderator's language* must be simultaneously simple and exuberant (simple because he must use terms that each panelist and the public can easily understand) and exuberant because he must use language that is clear and pleasing to the ears, according to the rules of stylistic resources or special effects on words).
-If, when promoting the contradictory, the Moderator realizes that he/she has put a question on the air and no one responds, perhaps for reasons of lack of understanding or timid desire, he/she must choose a Panelist to assist him/her so that, by checking it his eloquence or dialectic, could start a controversy.
A sense of self-criticism should be encouraged in any Moderator after the end of a debate, as we understand that the ultimate objective of a Moderator should be to "Create a productive debate" provoking unparalleled enthusiasm in the audience.
-In a debate in which there is an Audience, an effort will be required on the part of this character, to transform this passive Audience into an active Audience, during the debate, as this should be done in due course, to pass on his role to the active Audience, in order to direct it some questions or arguments, regarding the topic being addressed, making such people feel included in the debate.
When a Moderator does not prepare the discussion and/or does not research the topic, it is convenient for him not to moderate the chosen topic, this way he will avoid his performance being a fiasco and making his debate fruitless.
The Moderator must have total control of his/her debate, knowing deeply and technically the emotions of his/her Panelists, their opinions, history, beliefs, attitudes, dialectics, intellectuality, argumentative capabilities and their defects, so that such Know what rabbit hole or pack you are getting into.
Another essential thing when moderating a debate, you have to listen carefully to the Panelists' explanations, so that you don't get confused and ask stupid or unrelated questions, develop an "eagle's vision" always seeing in the dark, this metaphor must be interpreted how to pay attention to those side conversations/subjects (call attention to those whose faces are turned towards something outside the debate panel), wake up anyone who is sleeping or distracted, always take care so that any Panelist does not divert the topic under analysis or in Exposition.
-When the Panelists are discussing, do not interrupt, to move on to the next question you have prepared, if they are counter-arguing, let the debate flow by itself until reaching the climax, as few debates reach their maximum point of excellence , which is without a doubt the climax.
Finally, it is a 'sine qua non' condition that, beforehand, the Moderator is the first to antagonize the debate by asking spicy and exciting questions.
🔥Being a Moderator does not mean being a boss, but an advisor should do as much as possible, so as not to sanction, this should be the last resort to use as such.
Moderator moderates and does not command✊, always moderate!
❤️💡🧛👸🎉
_Our Official Contacts_ :
👉www.GrupoDebateLivre.blogspot.com
👉 GrupoDebateLivre@gmail.com
🇦🇴WhatsApp📞+244 954502811
#GrupoDebateLivre
👉Social media: @GrupoDebateLivre
*Thank you for your attention 👏!*
HOW TO LEARN TO DEBATE?
Hello debate lovers, that is, Panelists or Debaters, these are the likely names given to people who debate or discuss.
Anyway, the question is quite pertinent or interesting, isn't it?
😁Without a doubt it is.
Now let's see, if you are used to the various debate environments, especially you, you should read this article from head to toe or head to head, sorry for the excessive redundancies in that language of Camões,
We wanted to make the subject more spicy, but let's get to what really matters:
If you noticed correctly, we try to say the same things but with different words, trying to change the meanings of the terms, because in the Portuguese language, all words are polysemous (that is, they have more than one meaning), this trick works very well in any debate .
Note well, in a debate we have two parties of counter-positions, which we would call "Opponents", the idea is to appear as convincing as possible regarding the arguments.
Those who prepare in good time, with a certain degree of advance notice, have a better chance of winning a debate than those who have or had little time to prepare for a debate announced well in advance.
Now realize!
You were asked to enter a Public Debate, you were announced within a period of 5", it seems like total chaos or it seems like an earthquake has just shaken your sensitive heart.
Unfortunately, as Panelists, we must be prepared as soldiers for dialectical challenges, do not be afraid to express your opinions on topics that you do not have control over, because debating is not a question of being right or wrong. , since with well-presented arguments you can transform an erroneous notion as right and if by chance, you do not have consistency in your arguments, you will be able to unequivocally appear to have your concept right, but with a wrong bias 📚.
In fact, we have informal debates, which are the ones we see ourselves debating in our day-to-day lives. In this type of debate, we don't need to be very rigorous, because debating with friends, family and our peers,
requires a lot of sensitivity from us (you can give someone reason to end the discussion) in such a way,
harmony will be maintained within our intimate bosom; however, it is entirely the conception, which we must absorb in a formal debate, perpetrated by Panelists and/or Debaters highly armed by standards of eristic dialectics (the art of discussing with the sole aim of being right, through legal or illicit means) or dialectics (dialectics is the art of good discussion), at no time should we agree with our opponent, because if we did so, we would be publicly admitting our defeat before the panel.
Let us remember that there are many subjects in a theme and during our debates with Panelists' tricks, we must try to deal with the given theme, on subjects that we actually have expertise in, thus deceiving the moderator who is leading the debate in analysis.
Listen very carefully to the presentations of other opposing Panelists or co-religionist Panelists, only then will you know the ideal moment to attack, corroborate or counter-attack a specific Panelist.
Be careful with those direct questions (yes or no), they seem more like traps that will undermine the credibility of your arguments, in these cases, when you feel cornered, it is better to remain silent or say something like this: This It's relative, it's just your personal perspective (in this way, you lower the credibility of that opponent, creating a shield to protect yourself).
The sole purpose of a debate is to find the truth and justice of things. This truth can actually be the thing itself or simply the refutation of the weight of the argument about a supposed demonstrated truth and we would touch on justice, addressing the nature of the object or what the subject says about the object.🔥
-Get to know the panel in advance or, if this is not possible, adapt according to your size and/or intellectual disposition, regarding the topics being discussed.
Regardless of whether you think differently, always be a courteous Panelist, in order to comply with the rules of social coexistence while maintaining your argumentative and dialectical elegance.
If necessary, show your sources to give yourself irrefutable credibility in your presentations.
We finish here today and we hope to be quite sufficient,
making you learn how you should position yourself in the face of debates, to avoid a certain fiasco in your "raison d'être" regarding your participation in a given debate.
❤️🌍💡🏃✊
Contact us now🙏:
GrupoDebateLivre@gmail.com
Follow us on some platforms:👉
@GrupoDebateLivre
Our WhatsApp
📞+244 954502811
*Quem são os/as Formadores/as de Opiniões num Debate?!*
Esta pergunta retórica é intrigante não é?, Obviamente, que é💡🌍📚.
Provavelmente, já tenhas ouvido este nome Formador/a de opinião, ou não, então isso tão pouco importa, vamos ao " Pomo de Adão, aliás ao Pomo da questão ".
Num debate, evidentemente convidar-se-ia um/a especialista ou vários/as especialistas ad hoc, para vir/virem esclarecerem sobre determinada temática em análise, ora vejamos, se esteja a tratar-se acerca da (Saúde mental em Angola/ou não) seria ou pareceria conveniente chamar-se um/a psicólogo/a, psiquiatra ou minimamente um/a enfermero/a ou doctor/a em Medicina, para abordar mais tecnicamente este tema em seus variadíssimos assuntos, mas tal não vem o assunto, pois isso é muito mais preferível numa palestra, colóquio, fórum ou conferência e não, propriamente num debate, ora isso exigiria do/a especialista um conhecimento ou domínio profundo sobre dialética, oratória e retórica argumentativa, abrindo brechas às controvérsias, refutações,
contra-argumentações e afins, tal exigido para que haja um debate produtivo.
Entrementes, daí dá-se a primazia de chamarmos os/as Formadores de Opinião e não necessariamente os/as Especialistas, correndo o risco eminente de não se tratar dum debate, mas de qualquer coisa do tipo (palestra ou conferência) no intuito de esclarecer e não de se discutir.
Levanta-se então, inevitavelmente uma questão calorosa:
*Quem é o/a Formador/a de Opinião?*
Logicamente quando te deparas com qualquer tema ou assunto, na televisão, na rádio, nos jornais, no livro, na família, na escola, na sociedade, no trabalho, com os/as amigos/as ou no seu dia-a-dia, tens sempre a tendência de formares uma qualquer opinião, ou por pensamento ou exteriorizas isso com uma opinião seja tua, d'outrem ou até mesmo pessoal.
*Uns exemplos práticos:*
Assista o desenrolar duma novela na TV e vês um episódio ou a drama toda e inusitadamente te surge ou te ocorre um pensamento, dizendo que o/a ator/atriz não deveria adoptar aquele tipo de comportamento em detrimento da tua perspectiva ou algo inerente àquilo.
Ou ainda esteja assistindo, um jogo qualquer pela TV ou num Estádio e tens, muita ou pequena noção sobre a tipologia de tal jogo, emitirás ou terás uma opinião própria, a despeito ou a respeito do/a jogador/a, da natureza da equipa inicial e outros quinhentos...
Agora analise toda essa compreensão numa estrutura mais organizada, vamos lá:
Um/a *Formador de Opinião* , é uma pessoa pesquisadora e/ou investigadora, que vai atrás do conhecimento, afim de poder formar uma determinada opinião em detrimento de todos temas e assuntos existentes. As opiniões emitidas de uma pessoa Formadora de Opinião, devem ser sólidas e consistentes no intuito de despertar-se ou trazer-se a verdade e a justiça das coisas, diferentemente do/a Especialista que atem-se única e exclusivamente na compreensão de algo de sua especialidade e não atrevendo-se a entrar numa generalidade, com o risco de não ter visões sólidas em detrimento ao assunto em discussão.
Só pela nossa natureza humana,isso por si só, já dá-nos a capacidade de termos opiniões próprias e diversificada sobre todo tipo de assunto ou temática, entretanto, já somos _Fornecedores/as de Opiniões_ somente pela nossa própria natureza, uma vez que tenhamos uma opinião própria, sobre tudo que exista no Mundo.
No tocante aos aspectos ligados ao debate, é mais do que óbvio que os/as Formadores/as de Opinião, constituí toda estrutura do painel (isso quer dizer, são os/as *Moderadores/as, Painelistas ou Debatedores/as,* e às vezes, o público assistente/plateia), no entanto, entende-se que tais, pesquisaram o tema em discussão com certa antecedência, tendo a legitimidade de exprimirem com fontes credíveis, autênticas e referências nítidas exigidas na categorização dum "Debate Produtivo", e como estudantes, académicos e entusiastas do conhecimento livre, se deve sim, formar opiniões que provoquem a verdade e/ou factos evidentes.
Um/a *Formador/a de Opinião* , não deve ficar no alheio da atualidade, cientificidade, filosofia,do conhecimento religioso ou social e de toda esfera criativa do Mundo que nos circunda e não só. Num debate, os/as Formadores/as de Opinião, são pessoas capacitadas de abordarem todos os aspectos temáticos daquilo que se esteja em discussão, porque se entende que, mesmo não sendo especialistas, despertam a verdade e a justiça do assunto, afim de acordar um Público até então,ainda adormecido e não esclarecido em detrimento dum olhar mais preponderante na busca dum conhecimento incorruptível, para a evolução da humanidade, no ponto de vista da maturidade intelectual e cognitiva.
Não há idade para que possamos ser Formadores/as de Opinião, tais podem ser crianças, adolescentes/jovens e adultos/as, pois o que realmente importa, é a capacidade crítica e argumentativa inerente ao nosso senso criativo-mental, obviamente, seria um erro tremendo, pensarmos que um/a adulto/a é mais inteligente que um/a criança/adolescente, somente pelo fator idade e não propriamente intelectualidade👎.
O/a Formador/a de Opinião num debate, pesquisa,investiga,estuda, segue os rastos dos factos e conhecimentos/acontecimentos,orienta-se através de leituras,é um/a amigo/a do saber e da liberdade cognitiva,é um ser social e um/a intelectual, antes mesmo de exprimir suas opiniões no tangente, aos temas em discussão.Com todas as veras, o comportamento do/a Formador/a de opinião no que diz respeito ao debate, dependerá da maturidade dialética e conhecimentos das técnicas na participação dum debate deste/a mesmo/a Formador/a de Opinião.
Enfim, não tenho medo nem reciosamente intimide-se de expressar as suas opiniões,em sua casa,escola,igreja, trabalho,família e sociedade, pois p'ra ser Formador/a exige um conhecimento profundo sobre as coisas em discussões.
Esperamos termos sido exaustivos/as o suficiente, afim de podermos ter esclarecido tudo ou o bastante na aprendizagem do tema em questão, continue em companhia da nossa comunidade de debate e aprenda sempre connosco sobre os mistérios mais profundos desta grandiosa Arte Dialética.
Bem haja debates!
Nossos Contatos:
GrupoDebateLivre@gmail.com
WhatsApp p'ra debater📞+244954502811
Siga-nos, n'algumas redes sociais👉@GrupoDebateLivre
CALENDÁRIO TEMPORÁRIO DOS DEBATES SELECIONADOS:
1-Reflexões sobre a Paz (Debate Especial👉5/4/2024,às 16h00, Largo Primeiro de Maio).
2-O papel da Igreja na Sociedade👉7/4/2024.
3-Greve geral das centrais sindicais.
-Causas, efeitos e direitos👉14/4/2024.
4-O tamanho dos genitais: São importantes numa relação?👉21/4/2024.
As funções das estruturas mentais (Superego,ego,Id).👉28/4/2024.
5-A legalização do aborto (Debate prós e contras)👉5/5/2024.
6-Importância das relações sexuais no namoro e no casamento.👉12/5/2024.
Tais temas serão debatidos, consoante a cronologia determinada, entretanto divulgámo-los cá por entender, a antecedência temática, de tal forma à darmos tempo para cada painelista e moderador/a, possa preparar-se afim de proporcionar -se um debate produtivo e de alta qualidade.
Uma vez que o debate, tem como um dos objetivos encontrar a verdade e a justiça das coisas, dando-nos também à conhecermos outras perspectivas além das nossas sobre determinados assuntos, compreende-se que se deva conduzir nos caminhos da oratória, retórica e dialética (principalmente a dialética erística).
Obs: Todos/as estão convidados/as à participarem desta festa dialética.
Bem haja debate!
Nossos Contatos:
GrupoDebateLivre@gmail.com
Siga no Twitter👉 @OiGrupoDebate
Siga no Insta,TikTok, LinkedIn,YouTube, Telegram👉@GrupoDebateLivre
Nosso WhatsApp📞+244954502811
#GrupoDebateLivre #DebateShowBiz
#DebataConnosco
